Israel to Confiscate Equipment Used for Illegal Construction in Area C

J.P. Katz
3 hours ago
2 min read

A Quiet Policy Revolution in Area C

A major but largely underreported policy shift has just taken place in Judea and Samaria, one that could fundamentally alter the reality on the ground in Area C. According to Naomi Kahn, Director of the International Division at Regavim, Israel has finally implemented a long-sought enforcement tool: granting the Civil Administration full authority to impound and confiscate heavy machinery used in illegal construction by the Palestinian Authority.

At first glance, the change sounds technical. In practice, it represents a watershed moment after more than a decade of largely ineffective enforcement that allowed systematic, foreign-funded illegal construction to reshape territory under Israeli jurisdiction.

To understand the significance, context matters. Under the 1995 Oslo Accords, Judea and Samaria were divided into Areas A, B, and C. Areas A and B—about 40% of the territory—were placed under Palestinian Authority civilian control. Area C, roughly 60% of the land, remained under full Israeli administrative and security jurisdiction, with final status to be resolved through negotiations that never occurred.

Instead of developing Areas A and B, where nearly 70% of land remains vacant and available for housing and infrastructure, the Palestinian Authority adopted what became known as the Fayyad Plan in 2009: a strategy of creating de facto statehood through “facts on the ground” in Area C. This included tens of thousands of unpermitted structures, roads, and infrastructure projects—many funded by the European Union—built in direct violation of the Oslo framework.

For years, Israel’s response was hesitant and largely symbolic. Work-stop orders were ignored. Demolitions were rare. Heavy machinery seized during enforcement actions was routinely returned to offenders at Israeli taxpayer expense. As Kahn explained, crime not only went unpunished—it paid.

That equation has now changed.

Under a newly approved military order, the Civil Administration is empowered to impound machinery used in illegal construction, impose significant daily fines, and permanently confiscate equipment if costs are not paid within a defined period. In short, the bulldozers, tractors, and drilling rigs that enable illegal projects can now be forfeited to the State of Israel.

The impact is immediate and strategic. Without machinery, large-scale construction grinds to a halt. More importantly, foreign funders—particularly European governments—are unlikely to continue financing projects when their investments risk being confiscated. The policy transforms enforcement from reactive demolition into economic deterrence.

This move is part of a broader paradigm shift. Over the past year, illegal construction in Area C has dropped by more than 50%. For the first time in three decades, more illegal structures were demolished than built. Simultaneously, Israel has streamlined approvals for Jewish construction, registered unprecedented amounts of state land, and moved from a passive posture to proactive governance.

Kahn frames the change in stark security terms. Illegal “civilian” construction, she argues, is not neutral or humanitarian—it is strategic. Roads, infrastructure, and outposts double as potential staging grounds for terror, mirroring patterns seen in Gaza before October 7.

Seen together, these developments signal a decisive turn. Israel is no longer merely defending its legal rights in Area C—it is enforcing them. What once seemed politically untouchable is now operational reality, and the long-running balance of incentives has finally been reversed.